Moderator: Moh
esm wrote:The series was supposed to be a commentary on Swedish society, presenting the ugly side of human nature in a society that seems so equal and liberal
Zunu wrote:I think it was more just a simple matter of their being specially fun and interesting on account of being "home-grown," i.e. here's a good ripping crime thriller that takes place in OUR country for a change, instead of taking place halfway across the world. which meant there were cultural, social and geographic elements that resonated particularly with the Swedish reader. At least, from an American perspective the pacing, dialogue, scenery etc., had an exotic and unusual feel to it.
Zunu wrote:But also, was it really such a trope-y trope back then? The young pansexual scruffy bohemian female hacker seems like a hackneyed concept, but even now Lisbeth is one of only two examples of that on TV Tropes in the literature section of "Hackette" (and these were massively popular books before they became middling films). Also remember the first Tattoo novel came out in 2005, right on the heels of John Ajvide Lindqvist's 2004 "Let The Right One In," another international hit -- adapted in English as "Let Me In," which later became a film starring Chloe Grace Moretz as a vampire girl. It can't be a coincidence that Sweden was obsessing over dangerously OP young women around that time. I've never been there, but on paper Sweden is known as one of the top nations in the world in terms of gender equality, and I suspect unpacking these novels and others like them would speak to evolving social attitudes in the matter.
Celedam wrote:So, like I asked at the beginning, those novels/films are popular simply because they're Swedish?
Celedam wrote:That particular trope — the strong, unconventional woman — is not what I was thinking of, and frankly I'm a little annoyed that you assumed it is.
esm wrote:Actually, I read that Lisbeth Salander was supposed to be like a grown version of Pippi.
Zunu wrote:I think people don't necessarily mind tropes -- some people are looking for tropes to be "subverted" but other people just want their execution to be satisfying, whatever that means to them. Genre books in general tend to rely on standard tropes being resolved in a satisfying fashion. I do agree with you in terms of the movies that that was lacking on some level.
Zunu wrote:esm wrote:Actually, I read that Lisbeth Salander was supposed to be like a grown version of Pippi.
That's interesting. It's been a very long time since I read Pippi Longstocking but my dim recollection of her is as a kind of version of the Loki/Eleggua/Puck etc trickster god character, I guess fitting into what people call "chaotic neutral." Don't know if that's even accurate tho.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 8 guests