Starra wrote:Using computers to figure out how to code seems logical to me, and it's not like it's something subjective or creative in the same way as writing or drawing is -- coding is logic. There's a specific right and wrong. For logic-based sutff, like coding and other forms of programming, I think AI is genuinely a good time-saving (and cost efficient) solution.
GPT is a language model. It analyzes a massive amount of sample text in order to "learn" how language is used, and then it makes calculated guesses about how to produce its own text one word at a time.
Code is just another language to GPT.
However, you still need a creative mind to have the idea, form the query, and evaluate the response. You don't hear much in the news about all of the training GPT has gone through, nor about all of the garbage it still produces.
Think of GPT as the proverbial monkey at a typewriter. Given enough time, the monkey will produce the complete works of Shakespeare, but will the monkey know it?