I should have ventured into this part of the forum long ago.
ZONE!!!!
Moderator: Moh
急告
2013年02月13日
皆さま方におかれましては,ZONEを応援して頂き誠にありがとうございます。
デビュー以来ZONEを応援して頂いたファンの皆様、そして関係各位の皆様には大変残念なお知らせになります。
ZONEのメンバーMIYUこと長瀬実夕には,著しい不品行及び度々の業務不履行などの行為があり、これによりファンの皆様,関係各位に大変なご迷惑をお掛けし,弊社にも多大な損害を生じさせました。弊社は,長瀬実夕に対し,指導・説得を繰り返して参りましたが,残念ながら改善は見られませんでした。
そのため、弊社は,長瀬実夕との専属契約を続けていくことが困難であると判断し,長瀬実夕との専属契約を本日付けにて解除することとなりました。
今後、長瀬実夕個人の言動行動に関しては一切弊社には関わり合いございませんので、ご理解を頂きますようお願い申し上げます。
平成25年2月13日
株式会社 ランタイムミュージックエンタテインメント
There's something weird about Runtime's announcement. For them to even use the term 不品行 strikes me as being completely out of bounds, no matter what Miyu's been up to. Unless there's some mild contractual-law meaning to the term, it sounds like they're just calling her a slut. Even if she had been engaging in completely out-of-control free-form sexual shenannigans (which, incidentally would be her right to do so, and shouldn't diminish anybody's respect for her), why would they say that in a public announcement, unless it was to destroy any chance of her having any kind of career outside of Runtime?
There have been a few alarm bells ringing in the back of my head about Runtime for several years -- since about the time that Takayo suddenly dropped back out of sight, just after she and Mizuho were starting a joint project, and I'm beginning to think that maybe it's time to start listening to what those alarm bells have been trying to tell me.
Maybe Runtime isn't such a nice, heartwarming place to work, after all. The performing arts school itself seems to have dropped by the wayside, and the Runtime that we've seen during the past few years may be run by a very different set of people than the ones who were in charge when ZONE first started, or even a few years ago.
So here's a hypothesis (and maybe it's no more than that): Let's say that Miyu wanted to get out of her contract with Runtime -- that she really, really wanted to get out, and they wouldn't let her go. So in desperation, she simply refuses to cooperate, hoping to break the contract, even if it's on terms that are very unfavorable to her. So, like a bunch of thugs, they retaliate and fire her and call her a slut.
And another hypothesis (one which I'm afraid may be more likely): Remember when Takayo left, the stories that it had been as the result of sexual harrassment by some high-up executive? Maybe that happened to Miyu, and she turned him down -- and was ready to quit and/or press charges. And he's high up enough to get her fired, and to have her name smeared all over the place. From everything I've heard, tht kind of thing has been a chronic problem in the Korean entertainment industry for years, and I know it happens in other countries. I would expect it to be more handled with more discretion in Japan, but a thug is a thug in any country, even if he wears a suit and sits at the head of the board of directors.
If either of these scenarios is even remotely true, I hope that Miyu gets some good lawyers and drags Runtime through court to the point where the people responsible wind up in prison (or at least are exposed to the world for being the low-grade trash that they are), and she comes out looking like Joan of Arc. But I don't know if it will happen that way -- I just hope she survives, and the truth does come out...
Now that I think about it, there may be a strictly legal/contractual reason for some of the strange language and unlikely statements in the Runtime announcement. If they fire her without cause, that would probably free her of all obligations to Runtime, and allow her to sign with another management company. But if they fire her with cause (for "immoral conduct" and failing to fulfill her contractual obligations), that may leave her under some contractual obligations -- specifically, a non-competition agreement keeping her out of the entertainment industry for a set period of time after leaving Runtime.
Which brings me back to some of the suspicions about Runtime which have been running around in the back of my head since the start of Takayo's first blog.:
1. First of all Runtime's based (as far as I know) in Sapporo, and not Tokyo. That may seem like a minor point, but I'm not sure that it is. Being so far from the center of the Japanese entertainment industry may have had an adverse effect on their judgment.
I think that it's safe to say that there's a lot of corruption (and just plain unethical business practices) in the entertainment industry everywhere. I live in the suburbs of Los Angeles, and I've known more than a few people in and on the margins of the Hollywood-based entertainment industry. And from what I've seen, corruption and sleaze just go with the territory.
But Hollywood is a major center for the industry, and the people at the top (and pretty far down the ladder, as well) generally have enough good sense to be discreet about it. Even though the checkout-stand tabloids are full of ridiculous scandals involving Hollywood celebrities, corrupt practices on the business end rarely make the news -- and when they do, it usually causes serious trouble for the people involved. So the business side of the Hollywood entertainment industry tries very hard to keep its dirty laundry out of public view. They may be doing all kinds of corrupt, unethical, and just plain illegal things, but they're relatively discreet about it, and they do their best to put on a nice public face.
I imagine that the same holds pretty much true in Tokyo. I understand that Johnny Kitagawa got himself into a few scandals/legal scrapes that I'm sure he would rather have avoided a few years ago, but in general, the big players are discreet about their dirty business.
But when you get away from the major centers of the entertainment industry, that's not always the case. In cities which are big enough and lively enough to support good local bands (like Seattle, San Francisco, Manchester, or Sapporo), you're more likely to find a different mix of people on the management/business end: On one hand, there may be more people who are actually cleans, idealistic, and just plain nice, but on the other hand, the people who are corrupt and sleazy may lack the common sense and discretion of their big-time counterparts. They're more likely to think they can get away with things that really aren't going to work.
I suspect that the people who are currently in charge of Runtime may fall into that latter category -- corrupt small-timers who made it big, and think they can get away with anything. If that's the case, then what we're seeing now is serious bad judgment and miscalculation on their part.
2. Non-competition agreements: I think that these are pretty common in the entertainment industry (as well as some other industries). They basically prevent performers from quitting (i.e., breaking a contract), then going to work for another management company/studio/label/etc. Typically, I think, they impose the restrictions for a set period of time after the performer quits. They could include restrictions on performing, recording, promoting your career, or making reference to your previous work (with the company you left) to promote yourself.
Agreements of that sort have to have some legal limits, and they may not hold up in court, but if you want to challenges such an agreement, you do have to go to court, and you'll need good lawyers..
Based on what I saw with Takayo's blogs, I've suspected all along that she was trying to stay within the limits of a very restrictive, but time-limited, non-competition agreement. Her nutritionist's training was a two-year program, and she started her first blog just about the time that ended. She may have started the blog simply because she was done with school, and it was time to get back into music. But it would also make sense if she was operating under an agreement that required her to stay entirely out of the spotlight for two years. She could wait out the time by taking a two-year training program in a practical field (as opposed to going to a four-year college), then step back into the public eye.
I also noticed that for the entire year that she had that first blog, she didn't even hint about having had a previous career in the entertainment industry. If you didn't know anything about her, you would have assumed that she was just a nice girl who played guitar and sang, and who was taking the first steps toward getting herself established in the music world. And of course, she made no reference at all to ZONE, or to anyone connected with Runtime.
She ended that blog after about a year, I think, then started her second blog. And on the front page of that blog, she had a short bio, which openly stated that she had been a founding member of ZONE. I did the arithmetic, and I think that blog started three years (almost to the day) after she officially left ZONE.
The way I read it at the time was that she was operating under two restrictions: a two-year period when she had to stay entirely out of the entertainment industry, and a one-year period after that when she couldn't use her previous career with ZONE to promote herself. And she was being very careful to stay exactly within those limits -- which suggests that she was afraid of what would happen if Runtime's lawyers found any way to get her into court.
There might have been a third restriction, as well: against getting together with any former members of ZONE to form a group or perform in public. That wouldn't surprise me at all, considering the abrupt ending to her comeback. Even though she and Mizuho did just seem to be having fun with their Goss!p Girl project, it would have violated any restrictions on former members getting together outside of Runtime to form a group -- which could have brought the lawyers down on her and Mizuho both.
This isn't nice stuff, and I suspect that it would have been handled differently by most Tokyo-based management groups. H!P let Goto Maki go over to Avex with a buyout and no apparent hard feelings, for example. Typically, I think, when somebody leaves a group (whether it's idol, pop, or rock) and the group's management, any non-competition restrictions that they face are pretty limited in time or scope, they aren't forced out of the public eye entirely, and if something does go wrong, they don't have to drop out of sight for FIVE YEARS (which is how long it's been for Takayo, I think).
In fact, most former members of pop groups who have any interest at all in remaining in the industry manage to maintain some kind of visibility on the Internet even when their careers are completely out in the cold -- a blog, an occasional public appearance, a mention in a friend's blog, sighting by a fan here or there. That's what's so weird about Takayo's disappearance, Mizuho's near-total disappearance, and Tomoka's disappearance since leaving the re-formed ZONE -- with the exception of the photos that showed up on Mizuho's co-worker's blog, they're all gone. As far as I know, they've dropped off the Internet completely, which is spooky.
3. The ownership of ZONE's name. I'm pretty sure that Runtime owns it. Since ZONE started as a Runtime-originated project when the members were little kids, it makes sense that Runtime would have owned the name all along. And band names are valuable commodities, like brand names or trademarks. What I wonder about is whether they are legally able to prevent the former members of ZONE from performing together under a different name, even after any non-competition restrictions have run out. Whether Runtime legally can prevent it or not, they probably think they can, or at least that it's worth a try.
So maybe, just maybe, Runtime is in the hands of small-time bottom-feeders who think they're big shots and can get away with anything because they're the biggest operators in an out-of-the-way city. And maybe they've overreached themselves, and are about to bring the roof down on their own heads. I don't know if that's the case, but at this point, I just can't imagine that they're the same nice little performing arts school that used to put on heartwarming Crystal Live shows every year.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests