Moderator: Moh
CaptainBerryzGiraffe wrote:Yeah, not only the fact that UF allowed that - but it also shows the class of UF. They have generally been on the more progressive side of things, and it's clear from most (At least, recent...) contexts that they usually have the "look, we're only doing this because we have to because it's the social norm, but know that if the circumstances were different, we wouldn't be doing this" attitude.
Zunu wrote:Meanwhile, Yuuri, who's a notorious "player," suffers no consequences whatsoever, not even to my knowledge having to say a little "oops sorry I got my gf fired hehe."
Zunu wrote:CaptainBerryzGiraffe wrote:Yeah, not only the fact that UF allowed that - but it also shows the class of UF. They have generally been on the more progressive side of things, and it's clear from most (At least, recent...) contexts that they usually have the "look, we're only doing this because we have to because it's the social norm, but know that if the circumstances were different, we wouldn't be doing this" attitude.
It really makes me glad that Oda was able to speak her mind. But at the same time if I'm keeping it 100 I have to admit to myself that "we wouldn't be treating our girls this way except for the regrettable fact that society forces us" isn't really THAT super-progressive. Naturally they would rather not have to be bothered with watching over and punishing their girls who want to date. After they've invested so much time, money and hope on that girl (especially a once-in-a-generation level talent like Sayuki), it's a hassle when they are suddenly forced to change all the big plans they had. If it were up to the industry itself, fans would look the other way and stay loyal no matter what, the judgment of the management company would never be called into question by society, they could do whatever they wanted in terms of freedom or restrictions with no ill effect, even cases where managers slept with the talent would be overlooked. It hurts both their bottom line and their autonomy when a scandal comes out and they're forced to react. So, for me, I'd call them "progressive" when they actually take the courage to stand up and say, yeah no, we're not making her resign, she's 23, who she chooses to spend time with off the clock is none of our concern. Or at the very least, if they really want to speak out against societal strictures, they should come out and say so directly instead of vicariously through the talent.
But, CBG, you're definitely not wrong, the fact that they're letting Oda speak so frankly seems to confirm that, among the major idol houses, UF does allow its adult women a measure of independent thought and expression and their stance does give one the hope that they are at least willing to consider gingerly pushing the envelope toward more autonomy. I'd just personally consider that more along the lines of "lowkey progressive aspirations" as opposed to real progress.
Meanwhile, Yuuri, who's a notorious "player," suffers no consequences whatsoever, not even to my knowledge having to say a little "oops sorry I got my gf fired hehe."
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 34 guests