Putting it at the end makes it redundant since Yossie's statement already implied it earlier in the article. If it was mentioned before her statement, then there wouldn't be any real issue. So yeah, it's sloppy.
And I knew exactly what you meant about information from previous articles being used in new articles. I don't have issue with that at all. I wasn't referring to previous articles. I was referring to the same single article.
Assuming JonCC did copy the whole article at the time, then said article has since clearly been updated, and the updated article mentions nothing about it being edited. They should have just done a prepend and added the extra info at the front and acknowledged the addition/update.
I don't know why you think I'm taking it personally! I'm just posting my opinion one single part of the article, in a fairly civil manner. And even you, at least partially, agree that it was sloppy. Yossie being the subject matter of the article has zero baring on any of this. Why would it. I'm not arguing her innocence or something here. It's just an opinion. I'm not trying to change your mind. I really couldn't care less if you disagree with my opinion or not. It's perfectly okay to disagree.
And please don't try to point out how redundant I'm being talking about my opinion multiple times.